Evaluation of Catchment Afforestation Potentials of Seedlings of Three Native Tree Species under Different Soil Moisture Conditions

Author(s)

Neba Godlove Ambe , Egbe Enow Andrew , Forkwa Etienne Yong , Enow Elsie Ayamoh ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 67-83 | Views: 166 | Downloads: 46 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7611879

Volume 6 - December 2022 (12)

Abstract

In many parts of the world, key water catchments and watershed ecosystems have been degraded by successive waves of anthropogenic activities, thus requiring rehabilitation. One of the drawbacks of rehabilitation of degraded catchments is the lack of information about species suitable to local conditions. This study was designed to evaluate the catchment afforestation/reforestation potentials of three native tree seedlings under different moisture levels. In a complete randomised design (3 species x 4 treatments x 12 replicates) in a shade house, 144 pots with fairly uniform actively growing seedlings of Markhmia tomentosa, Funtumia Africana and Prunus Africana were treated to 4 soil moisture levels, corresponding to12.5, 25, 50 and 100% field capacity determined gravimetrically. Growth parameters (collar diameter, height and number of leaves) were measured fortnightly, while leaf area, biomass components and their derivatives were measured destructively after six months of growth. The seedlings’ rate of transpiration and evapotranspiration (gH2O/s/m2) were determined gravimetrically and water-use efficiency derived (g/L). The general effects of the soil moisture capacity on the growth performances were significantly different at P < 0.001. Markhmia tomentosa showed maximum leaf number (42) and leaf area (10712.8 cm2, 25% treatment), collar diameter (17.8 cm) and root shoot ratio (2.8, 50% treatment). Funtumia africana at 50% soil moisture capacity showed maximum height (88.6 cm) and total biomass (60.3g). Prunus africana had the least growth performances. Markhmia had the maximum rate of transpiration (12.69 gH2O/s/m2), evapotranspiration (14.20 gH2O/s/m2). Funtumia gave the best water-use efficiency (176.5 ml/g). Their least values were observed in P. Africana.  Funtumia africana had the best water use efficiency while Markhmia tomentosa had the best root development. These two species would be suitable for the afforestation/reforestation of water catchment areas in Cameroon at low altitude while P. africana, naturally adapted to high altitudes require further investigations.

Keywords

Water catchment, reforestation/afforestation, tree seedlings, growth parameters, transpiration, evapotranspiration and water-use efficiency

References

Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Bradshaw CJA (2008). Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23(8): 453-460.

Egbe EA, Forkwa EY, Mokake ES, Ngane EB (2013). Early growth, biomass allocation and water use efficiency of three species of tropical tree seedlings at four moisture level. Glob. Advanced Research Journal of Agricultural Science 2(2): 047-058.

Norman A, McGinnity P, O’Hea B (2005). Factors influencing the downstream transport of sediment in the Lough Feeagh catchment, Burrishoole, co. Mayo, Ireland. Freshwater Biological Association. Freshwater Forum 23: 126–138.

Malcom JR (2006). Global warming and extinctions of endemic species from biodiversity hotspots. Conservation Biology 20: 538–548.

Wright SG, Muller HC (2006). The future of tropical forest species. Biotropica 38(3): 287–301.

Ministry of Forests and Wildlife (MINFOF) Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2005). Evaluation of national forest resources of Cameroon, 2003–2004. MINFOF and FAO, Yaoundé, Cameroon

Laurance WF(2007). A new initiative to use carbon trading for tropical forest conservation. Biotropica 39 (1): 20–24.

Gullison RE, Frumhoff PC, Canadell JG, Field CB, Nepstad DC, Hayhoe K (2007). Tropical forests and climate policy. Science 316: 985–986.

Mollicone, D., Achard, F., Federici, S., Eva, H.D., Grassi, G., Belward, A., Raes, F., Seufert G, Stibig HJ, Matteucci G, Schulze ED (2007). An incentive mechanism for reducing emissions from conversion of intact and non-intact forests. Climatic Change 83 (4): 477–493.

Tavoni M, Sohngen B, Bosetti V (2007). Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate. Energy Policy  35 (11): 5346–5353

Ndenecho EN (2009). NGO input and stakeholder participation in natural resource management: Example of North West Cameroon. International NGO Journal 4: 050-056

Margulis S (2005). Causes of deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. World Bank workings paper No 22, Washington D.C.

Ndenecho EN (2006). Sustaining mountain environments and rural livelihoods in Bamenda Highlands, Unique Printers, Bamenda

Da Silva JMC, Tabarelli M (2000). Tree species impoverishment and the future flora of the Atlantic forest of northeast Brazil. Nature 404:72–74.

Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Brook BW, Ngonh PKL (2004). Southeast Asian biodiversity: An impending disaster. Trends Ecology and Evolution 19: 654–659.

Cregg BM (2004). Improving Drought Tolerance of Trees: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Acta Horticultura 630: 147-158.

Zahid MD, Nawaz A (2009). Comparative water use efficiency of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Dalbergia sisso. Internationl Journal Agricultural Biology 4: 540-544.

Egbe EA, Tabot PT (2011). Carbon sequestration in eight woody non timber species and their economic potentials in south western Cameroon. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 9: 369 -385.

Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, Jamnadass R, Simons A (2009). Agroforestry Database: a tree reference and selection guide 4.0. Accessed 16 December 2013. Available: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/af/treedb/.

Omino EA, Kokwaro JO (1993). Ethnobotany of Apocynaceae species in Kenya. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 40(3): 167-180.

Simpson GM (2006).  Plant systematic. Elsevier Academic Press.

Masinde WP, Stutzel H, Agong GS, Fricke S (2006). Plant growth water relations and     transpiration of two species of African nightshade (Solanum villosum Mill. ssp. miniatum (Bernh.ex willd.) Edmonds and S. Sarrachoides Sendtn.) under water-limited conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 11, 154-159

Martinez-Berdeja A, Valverde T (2008). Growth response of three Cacti species to radiation and soil moisture: An experimental test of the mechanism behind the nurse effect. Journal of Arid Environments 72:1766-1774.

Bloor JMG, Grub PJ (2003). Growth and mortality in high and low light: trends among15 shade-tolerant tropical rain forest tree species. Journal of. Ecolology 91: 77–85.

Jones HG (2004). What is water use efficiency? In: Water use efficiency in plant biology, edited by Bacon, M. A., Blackwell Publishing, Oxford;

González-Rodríguez H, Cantú-Silva I, Ramírez-Lozano RG, Gómez- Meza MV, Sauceda JI, Maiti RK (2010). Characterization of xylem water potential in ten native plants of north-eastern Mexico. Plant Stress Management 1: 219-224

Bunker DE, Carson, WP (2005). Drought stress and tropical forest woody seedlings: effect on community structure and composition. Journal of Ecology 93: 794–806.

Cernusak LA, Aranda J, Marshall JD, Winter K (2007). Large variation in whole-plant water-use efficiency among tropical tree species. New Physiologist 173:294-305.

Siam AMJ, Radoglou KM, Noitsakis B, Smiris P (2008). Physiological and growth responses of three Mediterranean oak species to different water availability regimes. Journal of Arid Environments 72, 583-592

Engelbrecht BMJ, Herz HM (2001). Evaluation of different methods to estimate under storey light conditions in tropical forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 17, 207-224

Ripullone F, Borghetti M, Raddi S, Vicinelli E, Baraldi R, Guerrieri MR (2009). Physiological and structural changes in response to altered precipitation regimes in a Mediterranean Macchia ecosystem. Trees Structure and  Function 23, 823–834

Otieno DO, Schmidt MWT, Adiku S, Tenhunen J (2005). Physiological and morphological responses to water stress in two Acacia spp. from contrasting habitats. Tree Physiology 25, 361–371

Whitehead D, Beadle CL (2004). Physiological regulation of productivity and water use in Eucalyptus. Ecology Management 10: 1016-1034.

Zhang L, Vertessy R, Walker G, Gilfedder M, Hairsine P(2003). Agroforestation in catchment context : understanding the impacts on water yield and salinity. Industry report. Climatic 1/07, eWater CRC, Melbourne, Australia

GLOWS-FIU, (2014). Climate and Landscape-related Vulnerability of Water Resources in the Mkindo River Catchment, Wami River Basin, Tanzania. Global Water for Sustainability Program, Florida International University. 46 pp

Sonter LJ, Johnson JA, Nicholson CC, Richardson LL, Watson KB, Ricketts TH (2017). Multi-site  interactions: understanding the offsite impacts of land use change on the use and supply of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 23:158–164

Azlini Razali, Sharifah Norkhadijah Syed Ismail, Suriyani Awang, Sarva Mangala Praveena & Emilia Zainal Abidin (2018).  Land use change in highland area and its impact on river water quality: a review of case studies in Malaysia. Ecological Processes 7, 19

Singh, H., Singh, D., Singh, S. K., and Shukla, D.( 2017) .Assessment of river water quality and ecological diversity through multivariate statistical techniques, and earth observation dataset of rivers Ghaghara and Gandak, India.  International Journal of River Basin Management: 15, 347–360

Lei C., Wagner P. D. and icola Fohrer N. (2022). Influences of land use changes on the dynamics of water quantity and quality in the German lowland catchment of the Stör.  Hydrology Earth System Science 26: 2561–2582

Wagner, P. D., Hoermann, G., Schmalz, B., and Fohrer, N. (2018).  Characterisation of the water and nutrient balance in the rural lowland catchment of the Kielstau. Hydrology Wasserbewirtsch. 62: 145–158

Farjad, B., Pooyandeh, M., Gupta, A., Motamedi, M. and Marceau, D. (2017). Modelling interactions between land use, climate, and hydrology along with stakeholders’ negotiation for water resources management. Sustainability 9: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112022, 2017 

Auliyani D., Basuki T. M., and Wijaya W.W. (2019). Spatial Analysis of Land Susceptibility to Degradation and Alternative Plants for its Rehabilitation. Indonesian Journal of Spatial and Regional Analysis. 33 (1):51-63

Lu, Y., Song, S., Wang, R., Liu, Z., Meng, J., Sweetman, A. J., Jenkins, A., Ferrier, R. C., Li, H., and Luo, W. (2015). Impacts of soil and water pollution on food safety and health risks in China. Environment International 77: 5–15

Owino J. O., Kemboi J. and Muturi G. M. (2021). Rangeland rehabilitation using micro-catchments and native species in Turkana County, Kenya. Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment  13(2): 30-40,

Antolini F., Tate E., Dalzell B., Young N., Johnson K., and eter. Hawthorne P. L. (2020). Flood Risk Reduction from Agricultural Best Management Practices. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 58 (1): 161-179

Cite this Article: