Impact Of Human-Animal-Interactions On High School Students Learning Outcomes In Vietnam
Author(s)
Luong Tuan Anh , Dao Le Minh Anh , Nguyen Khanh Tran ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 57-64 | Views: 51 | Downloads: 21 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12737104
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to evaluate the effect of Human-animal-interactions on learning performance of high school students in Vietnam through an intermediary mechanism. The study was conducted from December 2023 to April 2024. The data was collected through a questionnaire and analyzed using Smart PLS 4.1 software. The results show that Human-animal-interactions has a positive impact on the learning performance of high school students in Vietnam through direct and intermediate impact mechanisms.
Keywords
Human-animal-interactions, Learning Outcome
References
Edwards-Callaway, L. N. (2018). Human–animal interactions: Effects, challenges, and progress. Advances in cattle welfare, 71-92.
Fine, A. H. (Ed.). (2019). Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Foundations and guidelines for animal-assisted interventions. Academic press.
Griffin, J. A., Freund, L. S., McCARDLE, P. E. G. G. Y., DelCarmen-Wiggins, R., & Haydon, A. (2016). Introduction to Executive Function in Preschool-Age Children.
Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of business research, 109, 101-110.
Hair, J. F., Astrachan, C. B., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100392.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
Herzog, H. A. (2007). Gender differences in human–animal interactions: A review. Anthrozoös, 20(1), 7-21.
Hosey, G., & Melfi, V. (2014). Human-animal interactions, relationships and bonds: A review and analysis of the literature. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27(1).
Kotrschal, K., & Ortbauer, B. (2003). Behavioral effects of the presence of a dog in a classroom. Anthrozoös, 16(2), 147-159.
McCune, S., Kruger, K. A., Griffin, J. A., Esposito, L., Freund, L. S., Hurley, K. J., & Bures, R. (2014). Evolution of research into the mutual benefits of human–animal interaction. Animal Frontiers, 4(3), 49-58.
Memon, M. A., Ramayah, T., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2021). PLS-SEM statistical programs: a review. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 5(1), 1-14.
Poresky, R. H., & Hendrix, C. (1990). Differential effects of pet presence and pet-bonding on young children. Psychological Reports, 67(1), 51-54.
Poresky, R. H., & Hendrix, C. (1990). Differential effects of pet presence and pet-bonding on young children. Psychological Reports, 67(1), 51-54.
Rajan, V., Gee, N. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2017). Children’s play, self-regulation, and human-animal interaction in early childhood learning. In How Animals Help Students Learn (pp. 124-137). Routledge.
Sarstedt, M., Hair Jr, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian marketing journal, 27(3), 197-211.
Tomporowski, P. D., Davis, C. L., Miller, P. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2008). Exercise and children’s intelligence, cognition, and academic achievement. Educational psychology review, 20, 111-131.
Zulkifli, I. (2013). Review of human-animal interactions and their impact on animal productivity and welfare. Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 4, 1-7.