Isolation, Identification and Evaluation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes against Eggplant Fruit and Shoot Borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee), [Lepidoptera: Crambidae] Attacking Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)

Author(s)

Paolo B. Comaling ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 01-08 | Views: 14 | Downloads: 4 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23323355

Volume 10 - February 2026 (02)

Abstract

The use of biological control such as entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) could offer an effective, economical, and environmentally-friendly alternative management against the eggplant fruit and shoot borer (EFSB), Leucinodes orbonalis (Guenée). This study was conducted to isolate and identify EPNs from soils grown to eggplant and evaluate their efficacy against the EFSB. The EPNs were isolated and recovered using the insect baiting method. Morbid insect larvae were suspended in sterile water for 72 hours, and the suspension was examined under a stereomicroscope for the presence of EPN. From the four different areas, Heterorhabditis was identified through morphological characters. The in vitro efficacy of EPN was determined by inoculating three different concentrations of nematodes. Results revealed that there was an increasing percentage of both mortality and infection of the insect after 24-72 hours of incubation. At 72 hours, high percentages of infection were observed at the concentrations of 100 and 200 infective juveniles per ml with an average mortality of 60% and 78.33%, respectively. Thus, EPNs were effective at this particular concentration against EFSB

Keywords

Solanum melongena, Leucinodes orbonalis, biological control agent, Heterorhabditis, Eggplant fruit and shoot borer

References

i.          Agnello, A., P. Jentsch, E. Shield, T. Testa and M. Keller. 2014. Evaluation of Persistent Entomopathogenic nematodes. New York fruit quarterly. 22: 21-23.

ii.     Boemare, N. 2002. Biology, Taxonamy, and Systematics of Photorabdus and   Xenorhabdus. Chapter 2, p. 57-78 In: Entomopathogenc Nematology (GAUGLER I. ed). CABI Publishing. New Jersey. 35 pp.

iii.      Cranshaw, W.S. and R. Zimmerman. 2013. Insect Parasitic Nematodes.Web.15 June 2017. https://extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/insects/insect-parasitic-nematodes-5573/.

iv.       Ensminger A.H. and M.K.J. Ensminger. 1986. Food for Health: A Nutrition Encyclopedia. 1st ed. Pegus Press. Clovis, California. PMID:15210

v.      Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT). 2015. Production/Crops for Eggplant in 2013. Retrieved 20 November 2015. www.fao.org/faostat /en/#data/QC/visualize

vi.    Gapasin, R.M., J.L. Lim, E. L. Oclarit, L. T. Ubaub and M. C. Alde. 2017. Occurrence and Distribution of Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Sweet Potato Fields in the Philippines and their Implication in the Biological Control of Sweet Potato Weevil. Horticulturae 3(1):22.

vii. Garden Mentors. 2012. Growing Eggplant Successfully in Cooler Climates.Web. 18 December 2017. https://www.gardenmentors.com/garden-help/grow-your-own-food/growing-eggplant-successfully-in-cooler-climates/

viii.   Gaugler, R., E. Lewis and R.J. Stuart. 1997. Ecology in the service of   biological control: the case of entomopathogenic nematodes. Oecologia. 109: 483-489.

ix.       Grewal, P.S., R.U. Ehlers and D.I. Shapiro-Ilan. 2005. Nematodes as Biological Agents. CABI, New York, NY. 528 pp.

x.         Hortiasia. 2017. Brinjal. Retrieved 10 January 2018. https://hortiasia.com/brinjal/

xi.    Jansson R.K., S.H. Lecrone, R. Gaugler and G.C. Smart. 1990. Potential of entompathogenic nematodes as biological control agents of sweet potato weevil larvae. (Diabrotica). Entomol. Soc. Amer. N. Cent. Br. Proc. 25, 97-99.

xii.     Kaya, H.K. and R. Gaugler. 1993. Entomopathogenic nematodes. Annual Review of Entomology. 38: 181-206.

xiii.   Lewis, E.E., J.F. Campbell and R. Gaugler. 1998. A conservation approach to using entomopathogenic nematodes in turf and landscapes. In: Conservation Biological Nematology (P. Barbosa ed). Academic Press. San Diego. p. 235-254.

xiv.   Lewis, E.E. 2002. Behavioural Ecology. In: Entompathogenic Nematology (I. GAUGLER. ed). CABI Publishing. New Jersey. p. 205-224.

xv.     Shapiro-Ilan, D.I. and R. Gaugler. 2002. Production technology for entomopathogenic nematodes and their bacterial symbionts. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 28: 137-146.

xvi. Shapiro-Ilan, D.I., D.H. Gough, S.J. Piggott and J. Patterson Fife. 2006. Application technology and Environmental considerations for use of entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. Biological Control. 38: 124-133.

xvii. Stuart, R.J. and R. Gaugler. 1994. Patchiness in populations of entomopathogenic nematodes. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 64: 39-45.

xviii.  Talekar N.S. 2002. Controlling Egplant Fruit and Shoot Borer. AVRDC pub. #02-534. Web.17 December 2017. http://203.64.24 5.61/web_crops/eggpl ant/efsborer.pdf

xix.  Westerfield R. 2008. Pollination of Vegetable Crops (PDF). Retrieved 2009 July01. https://pubs.cases.uga.edu/caespubs/pubs/PDF/C934.pdf

Cite this Article: