Impact of Foliar Application of Micronutrients on Tomato cv. Sahil Under the Agro-Climatic Conditions of Dera Ismail Khan
Author(s)
Imran Ullah , Shitab khan , Shehar Yar Hafeez , Abdul Qayum Khan , Shoaib Bashir , Tuba Minallah , Mohammad Arshad Farooq ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 107-110 | Views: 429 | Downloads: 126 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5141663
Abstract
The Research was conducted with the main objective to study the influence of foliar application of micronutrients on Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cv. ’Sahil’ at Agricultural Research Institute, Horticulture, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan during 2016-2017. The experiment consists of eight treatments involving T1 (RD NPK through chemical fertilizers N: P2O5 : K2 O5 kg ha-1 (75 : 37.5 : 62.5)), T2 (T1+ Boric acid 0.571 g l-1), T3 (T1+ Zinc sulphate 0.246 g l-1), T4 (T1 + Copper sulphate 0.420 g l-1), T5 (T1+Ferrous sulphate 0.515 g l-1), T6 (T1 + Manganese sulphate 0.320 g l-1) and T7 (T1 + mixture of all micronutrients) and T8 (T1 + Multiplex 4 ml l-1) by mixing with simple water were imposed. The foliar application was made by using equipment knapsack sprayer (ASPEE) in the evening hours. The thrice times foliar spray were made at 10 days intervals starting from 40 days after transplanting seedling. The data clearly showed that the yield obtained with treatment T7 had significantly plant height (132.77 cm), number of branches plant-1 (5.96), fresh weight of plants (25.70 t ha-1), dry matter yield of plants (7669.04 kg ha-1), maximum days to last picking (166.01), number of fruits plant-1 (34.43), fruit length (5.47 cm), fruit diameter (4.57 cm), fruit volume (65.94 cm3), single fruit weight (49.00 g), fruit weight plant-1 (1.69 kg), number of locules fruit-1 (3.01), pericarp thickness (6.27 mm), fruit yield plot-1 (70.86 kg), fruit yield ha-1 (46.87 t.) and marketable fruit yield ha -1 (45.68 t). This treatment had maximum BCR 2.71: 1 out all other treatments than control.
Keywords
Micronutrient, Tomato, yield, yield components, BCR
References
i Ashokkumar, K. and R. Ravikesavan. 2011. Micronutrients diversity and per se performance in tomato. J. Agric.Sci. 3(2):107-113. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.
ii Bennett, O. L., Rouse, R. D. and Ashley, D. A. 2003. Response of foliar application of micronutrients on tomato variety “Hisar Arun”. Agronomy Journal, 57: 296-299.
iii Bhattarai, S.P. 2005. The impact on micronutrient on yield and yield component of tomato Ph.D. Thesis, School of Biology & Environmental Science, Faculty of Arts, Health & Science, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton.
iv Bolonhezi, A.C., M.M. Justi, R.C. Oliveira and C. Bolonhezi. 2000. Fertilizer impacts for varieties of tomato, plant development and retention of reproductive structures. Field Crop Res. 53(5): 611-613.
v Cetin, O. and L. Bilgel. 2002. Effects off different irrigation methods and micronutrients on shedding and yield of tomato. Agric. Water Manage. 54(01):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00138-X
vi Nyakatawa, E. Z., Reddy, K. C. 2004. Studies on effect of application of micronutrients on nutrients uptake in tomato. Agronomy Journal, 92:992–999.
vii Pankhurst, C. E., McDonald, H. J., Hawke, B. G., Kirkby, C. A. 2003. Effect of micronutrients on growth and yield of chilli. Soils and Crops, 13 (1): 123-125.
viii Pandita, M. L., Arora, S. K. and Singh, K. 1976. Effect of plant growth regulators on fruit set, early and total yield of tomato variety HS-101 (L. esculentum Mill.) during summer season. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 8 (3&4) 112-116.
ix Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. C. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Soil tillage Research, 152-161.
x Patil, B. C., Hosamani, R. M., Ajjappalavara, P. S., Naik, B. H., Smitha R.P. and Ukkund, K.C. 2008. Effect of foliar application of micronutrients on growth and yield components of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 21 (3): 428-430.
Cite this Article: